An agentic review system

Code reviews that think before they block.

Give a fake person the context, standards, and hard-won instincts of a real one. It finds problems, attacks its own findings, and grounds every decisive claim before it touches your PR.

  • No generic lint
  • Every claim at file:line
  • Human rails stay on
epoch-ml / zergPR #496
fi
fake-idanreviewed 14s ago
COMMENT

[fake idan]Comment — the lease is fenced correctly.

I went deep on publication, expiry, and the takeover path. I did not line-review the generated clients.

REFUTED

The apparent stale-writer race is closed by the token compare at sync/lease.py:184.

SOLID

Heartbeat ownership is checked again immediately before publish. sync/publish.py:92

7 files scoped4 candidates killed$0.84

The method

Most findings should die.

Detection is easy. Trust comes from trying hard to prove yourself wrong—and knowing when a real defect still does not justify a block.

  1. 01
    Scope

    Map the changed surface and owner directives.

  2. 02
    Find

    Fan out across dimensions with a PR-specific rubric.

  3. 03
    Attack

    Independent agents try to refute every candidate.

  4. 04
    Groundmandatory

    The lead re-derives every decisive claim in the code.

  5. 05
    Calibrate

    Choose the honest severity, state, and scope note.

Three non-negotiables

01 / REFUTE

Adversarial verification

A second agent is paid to kill each finding. No concrete failure scenario, no finding.

02 / RE-DERIVE

Lead grounding

Anything decisive is independently re-read in the code. The lead never repeats a subagent’s confidence.

03 / CALIBRATE

Judgment over volume

Severity follows direction and blast radius—not how clever a bug sounds. Over-blocking counts as failure.

A platform for points of view

Your fake person remembers what the generic agent never knew.

Every person lives in your private workspace, with their own knowledge base, review doctrine, voice, traps, repository access, and audit trail.

  • Versioned knowledge and recurring failure traps
  • Repository-specific scope and severity policies
  • Private by default, publishable when you choose
  • Explicit identity on every GitHub artifact
Build a point of view
IPRIVATE · ACTIVE

Fake Idan

Systems, architecture, and calibrated review.

38 sources17 traps94% grounded

Start with one real opinion

Clone the judgment.
Keep the accountability.

Create your fake person
fake idan

Agentic review with human standards.

© 2026 Epoch AI